Honestly, I thought this was a pretty open and shut case. I'm not sure why kimsim wanted to open a trial.
Prosecuted Ximbos:
Internet Republic of Bimboland against: emma1999, daddysprincess666, and lilfaggot
Starbuck wrote:
Honestly, I thought this was a pretty open and shut case. I'm not sure why kimsim wanted to open a trial.Probably because he wanted to wake up the court and remind that it still works.
Just to echo what’s been said, it’s definitely possible they all live in the same house BUT we were told to contact the detectives or kimsim if you had a roommate or s.o. or whatever the case. And not responding at all to the mails is definitely highly suspicious.
Edit: Sorry for the short response. Was thinking on the fly as I was heading back into my apartment. Coming back to elaborate some more.
I looked back at some other posts in here. It could be kids, but the names of the accounts themselves don’t seem like they’re made by kids? Unless kids today actually do that, in which case ignore me there.
I’m not saying they’re clearly guilty, but the login behavior and unresponsiveness is suspect. Since they didn’t respond to mails, I definitely feel like they won’t respond to this thread and defend themselves.
Another thing, if it’s even possible, is to see if they’re online at the same time (a bit less suspicious, points to maybe people in the same house) or if it’s logins one after another (usually indicative of one person switching between accounts). In a game I play outside of Bimboland, you can tell when people have alternative accounts usually because of their login patterns and “last online” times; they’re seldom ever online at the same time.
Edit 3 (sorry lol): If you take a look at their debate responses, they all write incredibly similarly. All lowercase, no apostrophes in sight. Very possible they’re all different people who write the same but given the current context, also suspect.
You can't keep doing shitty things and then feel bad about yourself like that makes it okay. You need to be better. -S3E10 Bojack Horseman
Doesn't look like they are kids to me either... because of names, debate statements, etc. But they could be teens. Person who is 17 could be a kid for some of us, but actually isn't a kid. Maybe they just don't care to respond no matter of the age. I would look for a few more things in such situations:
1. Do they or one of them log in from different IP sometimes and how often
2. If previous is positive, does it happens sometimes that at least two accounts are online at the same time and make some activities on site (clearly, one person can't be at two different places at the same time)
3. Time frames or periods of inactivities - let's say it is one person. What happens if she went on vacation and can't log in often or at all. What is going on then with other two accounts? If none of them log in for let's say 10 days, or only one logs in sporadically while other two stay inactive, it's most likely one person. Farther, what is happening on a daily basis? They have to sleep sometimes and do other activities during the the day.
From this list we can see a break between 1st and 9th July, possibly jail time. Besides that, they usually log in between 10pm and 2am during the night. In the morning, they rarely logged in before 9am, and usually are active between 10am and 2pm during the day. There are only two log ins of Emma before 8am, and only one log in of lilfaggot at 19:16 on 10th July that brake a certain time pattern. Beside these three exceptional log ins there are no log ins between 3pm and 10pm, and between 2am and 8am on the given list. However, list includes only 7 days of log ins which might not be enough.
Welcome new bimbos & himbos ❣
I identify as transparent, pronounces who/where
(don't take this seriously, because if you do it's your own fault)
Himbo Shop Requests thread, Right item - Wrong category & No-name items report thread
Also about the July 1st to 9th thing: neither of the other two accounts has any activity during that period until emma1999 returns to the site on the 9th. Then the other two log in that same day. Chances that that pattern is merely coincidence are low.
Ignore this section if you don’t care about the math and skip down to the italicized words.
Let’s assume, for ease of math, that they have one chance per hour of the day to log in. They are active generally from 10 AM to 2PM and 10 PM to 2 AM. That’s 8 chances out of 24 to log in. Therefore 16/24 (simplified to 2/3) chances to not log in per day, to be conservative.
If by chance these are 3 different people, they had 7 days (7/2-7/8) to log in prior to emma logging in again. (2/3)^7 is approximately 0.0585, or about 5.85% chance that they all happened to choose to not log in for 7 days straight.
If my math is wrong let me know, lol, but point is the chance of that being merely coincidence is tiny.
You can't keep doing shitty things and then feel bad about yourself like that makes it okay. You need to be better. -S3E10 Bojack Horseman
I'm unsure if anyone mentioned this yet so far, but usually multiple accounts the creator will not really differentiate between the accounts.
In this case they are all in freethinkerland. Names/patterns of dress also should be taken into consideration. If it is 3 different individuals they would all seemingly have differing opinions, attitudes, names, level etc. Ofc sometimes this sort of trend is more obvious than in other cases - but it has been something of note in past trials as well.
In this case they are all in freethinkerland. Names/patterns of dress also should be taken into consideration. If it is 3 different individuals they would all seemingly have differing opinions, attitudes, names, level etc. Ofc sometimes this sort of trend is more obvious than in other cases - but it has been something of note in past trials as well.
Very busy with school at the moment, so temporary hiatus D:.
This information was provided by Detective Drew ("Gang" refers to daddysprincess666 and lilfaggot. Stats were taken from the emma1999 account.):
Debates against GANG
Percentage of debates against gang: 28.13% (108 / 384)
Win rate of debates against gang: 68.52% (74 / 108)
[Total debates count including dead: 380]
Percentage of debates against gang: 28.13% (108 / 384)
Win rate of debates against gang: 68.52% (74 / 108)
[Total debates count including dead: 380]
Fights against GANG
Percentage of fights against gang: 11.69% (63 / 539)
Win rate of fights against gang: 76.19% (48 / 63)
[Total fights count including dead: 539]
Percentage of fights against gang: 11.69% (63 / 539)
Win rate of fights against gang: 76.19% (48 / 63)
[Total fights count including dead: 539]
Percentage of all votes received from GANG: 3.74% (39 / 1044)
Percentage of all votes received from GANG: 2.52% (38 / 1509)
I am thinking violation of stated rules. Too bad.
People outnumber bears in this world. Farmed salmon are poisonous. Toto, I have a feeling we're not in Kansas anymore.
Strbuck wrote:
This information was provided by Detective Drew ("Gang" refers to daddysprincess666 and lilfaggot. Stats were taken from the emma1999 account.):
Debates against GANG
Percentage of debates against gang: 28.13% (108 / 384)
Win rate of debates against gang: 68.52% (74 / 108)
[Total debates count including dead: 380]Fights against GANG
Percentage of fights against gang: 11.69% (63 / 539)
Win rate of fights against gang: 76.19% (48 / 63)
[Total fights count including dead: 539]Percentage of all votes received from GANG: 3.74% (39 / 1044)Percentage of all votes received from GANG: 2.52% (38 / 1509)
Based on stats it really doesn't look like they vote frequently for each other. She got way more votes from other players than from the 'gang'. Even if it is the same person, it's hard to conclude that the purpose of side accounts is to rise winning rate because she didn't receive many votes from them. There are fights and debates between them, still, nothing so prominent. Only numbers that stand out are wins against the 'gang' in both fights and debates, yet other players voted for her. It's really hard to say that we have cheating here with the purpose of building stats. Her outfits don't look better than outfits from other two accounts, it's not even obvious that she has more chances to win them.
About style and overall appearance that Esuna mentioned... besides being all three from Freethinkerland, I don't see something specifically similar. Emma has black wig in most of her outfits deddysprincess has blonde wigs. Make up and style don't look so similar. Similarity between Emma and lilfaggot, face tat upside-down cross maybe? Both have timid eyes on romantic look and eyes-cucumbers on pajama party look. Still, nothing so significant. I am not even sure what we are looking for anymore...
Casual/Daytime
Party
Red Carpet
Date/Romantic
Cosplay
Pajama Party
Gothic
Spooky
Music
Retro
Sexy (daddyprincess and lilfaggot)
The rest of Emma's outfits
Welcome new bimbos & himbos ❣
I identify as transparent, pronounces who/where
(don't take this seriously, because if you do it's your own fault)
Himbo Shop Requests thread, Right item - Wrong category & No-name items report thread
Lily, I would quote you but the post is long xD.
Put yourself though in the shoes of someone who cheats and knows that there are repercussions to actions ... which I'm sure many know of this by now.
It makes little sense to go all out voting for yourself; it becomes obvious to others, I'm sure that everything the detectives are looking at is a compilation and not just the voting trends.
Also, the trends in accounts I brought up because it's been a trend in the past with the Athens group, etc.
Since a few high profile trials have gone forth it means there's more transparency on cheating, but on the negative side of the coin, it means cheaters are more likely extra careful not to get caught or seem less suspicious.
Put yourself though in the shoes of someone who cheats and knows that there are repercussions to actions ... which I'm sure many know of this by now.
It makes little sense to go all out voting for yourself; it becomes obvious to others, I'm sure that everything the detectives are looking at is a compilation and not just the voting trends.
Also, the trends in accounts I brought up because it's been a trend in the past with the Athens group, etc.
Since a few high profile trials have gone forth it means there's more transparency on cheating, but on the negative side of the coin, it means cheaters are more likely extra careful not to get caught or seem less suspicious.
Very busy with school at the moment, so temporary hiatus D:. Ximboland stats
-
Population:
Prime Ximbo:
Treasury (USD): $0.00
Next Prime Ximbo election: 01.01.1970
Next State Minister elections: 01.01.1970
State in Charge:
Social media: | |
-
Best State Warriors this month:
nullplayer
- 2592261 points
Legal Alien - lvl 44
mbbybbby
- 555319 points
State Minister - lvl 270
CarCrashBimbo
- 343302 points
Senator - lvl 57
Susan Slutzky
- 275409 points
Senator - lvl 260
Eunyce
- 272687 points
Fashion Manager - lvl 260
-
Sexiest this week:
AikiraSora
- 17517 points
Senator - lvl 77
SinksTears
- 16856 points
Citizen - lvl 163
Sandi Lut
- 3719 points
State Minister - lvl 289
Crocheting Bimbo
- 2721 points
Senator - lvl 120
lillyfee
- 2679 points
Citizen - lvl 182
-
Most reputable this week:
Yariman
- 511 points
Senator - lvl 18
thecoquettebabe
- 321 points
Legal Alien - lvl 8
AikiraSora
- 307 points
Senator - lvl 77
Slick_D
- 293 points
Citizen - lvl 114
lillyfee
- 289 points
Citizen - lvl 182
-
Best fighters this week:
Spiffyfunpants
- 53 points
Senator - lvl 301
AikiraSora
- 47 points
Senator - lvl 77
SilentlyScreaming
- 44 points
Citizen - lvl 59
Eunyce
- 33 points
Fashion Manager - lvl 260
leopardluvr
- 27 points
Citizen - lvl 40
-
Best debaters this week:
califlower
- 20 points
Fashion Designer - lvl 75
sachele
- 14 points
Legal Alien - lvl 19
Kyele
- 11 points
Citizen - lvl 196
Layla Zenin
- 11 points
Citizen - lvl 210
SilentlyScreaming
- 10 points
Citizen - lvl 59
