So like, I've gone over
what I can: the 3 accounts' profiles, stats, badges, comments on their profiles,
forum post history, debate statistics, debate answers and debate votin’. I feel
a bit dirty after all that diggin’ :p Since I'm so super late to the discussion
a lot will be repetition of what a lot of others have noticed already :( sorry
'bout that.
Profiles, stats and
badges: It seems to me like
emma1999 is the main account which seems logical since it was made a long time
before the other two. She also has the most badges and highest stats (although
not by much), which indicates that's the account they wanna progress on. Not to
mention her bio is the most detailed. None of this, however, is like a
guarantee of there bein' a main and alt accounts. It could just be a matter of
activity or not bein' bothered with stats or profiles (plenty of bimbos are
here to just chat or dress up). Both Lil and Princess are legal aliens (would
make sense for throwaway alts) while Emma Is citizen (again, makes super sense
since if it’s her first and main account).
Comments: Princess commented on Lil's profile on May 31st
at 23:28:36. She also commented on Emma’s profile at almost the same time (May 31st
at 23:29:11). Meanwhile Lil commented on Emma’s profile almost a day earlier
(May 31st at 0:02:45). There has been no other interaction between the 3
accounts in their comments. So… like no indication of any cheatin’ here. Princess
may have just had a daily quest for comments. Sadly I couldn’t look into how
they commented on other bimbos’ profiles to maybe like, discern similarities in
their writin’ styles.
Forum posts: Most of all three accounts’ posts are in countdown
or count up threads so there’s nothin’ to be gleamed from this. Emma’s
supposedly between 19 and 20 years of age and Lil’s timezone is CET (his time
was 02:53 when the server time was 00:53)
Debates: I looked at all of Lil’s and Princess’s
debates as well as all of Emma’s debates from May onward (the ones before would
totes ruin the statistics, but I don’t know exactly when the other 2 accounts
were made so I took all of May). First of all, this was all done manually and
in the case of both Lil and Princess 2 times to make sure I didn’t misscount.
The numbers are still probs a bit off since like, it’s kinda hard to scroll up
without gettin’ lost all the time :/
There was a super long
pause between September 2018, when she had a debate with Mindy, and May 2019,
when she had a debate with nothing4real. Emma has won 71/155 of all her debates
since returnin’ in May. This comes to a 45,81 % win rate.
Emma’s first debate
with Lil was on May 26th and she’s been debatin’ him relatively
consistently for most of June, with a few 1-2 day breaks in-between. However,
towards the end of June she seemingly stopped debatin’ him, havin’ waited 4
days to challenge him again after June 25th. She hasn’t debated him
since that day. She did win a huuge percentage of all her debates with him (52/61
or 85,25 %). So, either he’s tryin’ to get his curious badge with poor or ”don’t
vote for me” answers, in which case he’d probs be part of the curious quest
thread? Is he? Oooor, his answers were made intentionally bad to make him an
easy target. Notice how a large portion of all of Emma’s losses against Lil occurred
in the last week of May alone. I was still super attentive in debates back then
and I remember his opinions were weird but not “don’t vote for me” like they
are now. Were they changed around the start of June? If so, that is somewhat
incriminatin’ in my opinion.
Emma’s first debate vs
Princess was on May 30th. And since then she’s been debatin’ her in
a similar manner to Lil all the way to June 27th. Notice how she instigated
and won/lost debates vs Princess on July 4th, when she was supposed
to be absent/banned. What is the deal with that???? All in all her win rate
vs Princess was pretty poor, bein’ only marginally better than vs everyone else
(22/47 or 46,81 %). Which makes sense considerin’ the section on debate
answers.
Also notice how on like all of the days none of the 3 accounts are involved in more than 6 (and even that's rare) debates with either of the other 2 accounts. They should theoretically have like 210 tokens between them each day. I wonder how many debates AND fights in total they had between themselves each day?
Link to picture of
sheet since it's too big for the forum :D (it took some time to make, I’m gonna be totes honest with you)
Debate answers: Like Railophone I noticed a bit of a similarity between some
of their answers. Namely they’re all super short, never capitalized at all,
use wrong spellin’ (“dont”, “im”, etc.) and they often use some similar words. Like
“everything else is shit” or “companies dont give a shit about the earth”, “save
the earth, kill all humans” etc. But I’m not smart enough to figure out if it’s
the same person typin’ all those. Also, I noticed Lil’s debate answers are
either intentionally poor so as to provoke votin’ for the opponent (“Im a
satanist” won’t get you a lotta points I think :D) or straight up “dont vote
for me” (I think like 4 categories have that). Emma’s and Princess’ answers are
super short but neither is tryin’ to get the other one to win, which is why they’re
so “evenly matched”.
Debate votes: I noticed like hardly any votin’ was done by
any of the 3 for either of the other 2. Emma only voted in 5 of the 24 (20,8 %)
debates between Lil and Princess, havin’ voted 4 times in favour of Princess. Lil
also only voted in 10 out of 47 (21,3 %) debates between Princess and Emma, votin’
4 times for Emma and 6 times for Princess. Now it gets a lil’ bit interestin’
with Princess’s votes. She voted in 22 out of 61 (36 %) of all debates between
Emma and Lil. And she voted for Emma 18 times, a muuch heavier bias. 10 out of
the 18 votes for Emma were made in the last 10-ish debates too – likely after the
first warnings and questions started showin’ up in her mailbox? All in all
though they tend to vote pretty sparingly for each other in debates.
I am too tired to do
fights as well, sorry :(
I think a lot of their
behaviour (outside of fights since I haven't checked those) is at best circumstantial evidence for cheatin’ with multiple
accounts. However, as Esuna stated this is not the first anti-cheatin’ BBQ so
if Emma did decide to start cheatin’ in May, she may have done her homework beforehand and
did her best to not be too obvious (meanin’ she also sent debates back and
forth between the alts and didn't cheat too frequently). At the end of the day, she did get a lot of
debate wins vs Lil and a decent number vs Princess.
My question though,
since I really can’t do this manually: how many times was Emma the instigator
of the debates against her suspected alts and how many were the debates started
by the alts? I think this is super important, ‘cuz free challenges bein’ thrown
her was also gives her progress towards the curious badge on top of the extra
chances to win the debate. This also goes for the debates both Lil and Princess
had with others – how many were started by the other bimbos? If it turns out that Emma spent her tokens
challengin’ other bimbos while Lil and Princess spent them challengin’ each
other and Emma (remember, they’re all civilians or legal aliens so they only
get like 70 tokens per day!), then that to me is pretty damnin’ evidence
against them. Please, could we get data on that? :)
Also the login data from the IP is pretty important. Like Railophone pointed out, it's preeetty unlikely they just happen to be loggin' in back to back to back for 2 months straight. I'm interested in learnin' where Emma logged in from though. 'Cuz like, she had to in order to start those debates vs Princess. If that login came from a secondary IP (such as school considerin' she's 19-20 years old), then maybe the other 2 also logged in from that same IP shortly before/after? If that were true then this is an open and shut case based on login information alone.
To me though, the best evidence against 'em we have is the fact they've continuously ignored all attempts to contact them, even
after all the jail time. To me that screams of a guilty consciousness. And they all clearly know English so it can't be a language barrier thing. If they were siblings/roomies they could and should have done what Naveen and Katherine N did and notified someone 'bout it. They still
can, so the fact they haven't makes me think they aren't multiple people livin' under the same roof.
