"After all, every state is meaningful. The members of Pink House will also be encouraged to give their input on proposed laws and regulations I am looking to instate."I and the other members of Pink House have scarcely ever corresponded with you due to you being online and generally not catching up with what's going on. You frequently do not know about site events and miss important conversations that give you vital context about the functioning of the site. Additionally, around a week and a half ago I messaged to indicate my concerns over the way you lifted points from other users in your VOD you publicly shared with us (without asking or speaking to those users). I also messaged to express my frustrations with you sharing negative information about other SMs that was factually inaccurate and hurtful.
While it is understandable to sometimes miss things, I expressed to you that the specific SMs in question (past and present) were hurt by your actions (which spread false, negative, and damaging information about them to an audience of internet strangers) and that they might appreciate a simple message to discuss the situation, perhaps an apology if you wanted to do that. Obviously, your choice! However, it says a lot to me that you did not do that and you are claiming here you would encourage the other current members of PH to pitch in their ideas when you haven't done that yourself? Have you collaborated with us? Have you talked with us in group discussions about site plans? Have you tried to foster an amicable relationship as (essentially) coworkers? I don't know that I would say you have!
Not to place too much of a burden on you here, but it would have taken just two messages to two different people, short and sweet, to let those other members of PH know that you were wrong and are sorry for spreading misinformation. The ability to admit when you were wrong and foster healthy relationships with others is surprisingly valuable and kindness and compassion is a meaningful asset to this position. It saddens me to see you running for PB despite the fact that you have refused human connection and collaboration with others, an opportunity I privately and politely offered to you. There are essentially no downsides to having a respectful relationship with others, and yet you haven't done that. I don't feel that you care to work with the other people who are also passionate about this site and contribute vast amounts of time and energy into it, don't feel that you see fit to read their messages enough to understand how this site actually works, what is going on, what the rules are, what might potentially be important for you to know or do, especially in a role like PB.
Additionally, I find your plans around r18 content to be not extensive enough. If you’re thinking illustrations and writing are okay, what does that mean? If you allow NSFW art, that would be different than the current policy and actually MORE open about r18 content, but it’s also a can of worms you’d have to be prepared for. What content exactly would you allow vs not allow? How will you handle situations and support your FP if someone, say, posts illustrated art of a character who is clearly a child? What if someone roleplays nonconsensual content? What will you do then? The complete lack of a plan here says how little you’ve actually thought about this and shows that you are unprepared to handle the burden of this public office.
It's really disappointing to see you post this having taken no initiative to improve your relationships with others in PH, no attempts at collaboration, no ability to simply read communications with other current PH members, no attempt at even a simple apology. That doesn't give me confidence that you actually care about the site and community here as much as your stream views, which haven't really been mentioned in the main manifesto. In fact, when people mentioned your VODs critically you actually made them private. Do you not want people to know that you stream about XL, that you talk negatively about others debate answers on stream, that you rag on other people's outfits and claim people are copying you, that you copy and paste other people's words into your manifesto, that you shared hurtful misinformation about other SMs which you outright refused to rectify with your audience or privately apologize for? That you share private PH information with the public without permission? Any of that? No? I don't get it!
And it also makes me wonder: if halobear8 is a Twitch streamer for XL (they are), a Youtuber for XL (they are), has made sure to mention this at every opportunity without otherwise engaging in site dialogue, and has already prematurely shared private Pink House information with online strangers on stream (they discussed Fashion Week before anyone else knew it was occurring, among other things), how can she be trusted to keep site information private? How can she be trusted to not exploit her position for views? How can she be trusted to respect site users and their differing opinions, including about "sexual" topics, a fairly obvious and straight-forward draw of the game for many people, and nothing to be ashamed of on a site called Bimboland? Does halobear8 not care about insulting and pushing away well-meaning site users who are just having fun with this cute little site we all love? How can users, Pink House members, and admins trust that person?
:(
halobear, I'm disappointed. It's not like no one's reached out to you. It's not like no one's talked to you about these issues privately before bringing them here. You just don't seem to care. I don't get it. Why would you want to be PB if you don't care?
***
Some halobear8 quotes from their VOD:
8:35 “If I do win because of nepotism, because of Freethinkerland nepotism, that would be lit.”^ wow! Interesting to hear out loud coming from “an individual with a very strong sense of justice.”
6:19 “I think Pollyx was also talking about running or mentioned it flippantly in the forum saying something like, so that, in case somebody who is also on Ximboland is watching this stream or this VOD so that they’re not totally confused on if they’re running or not, it’s just they mentioned—Pollyx, pronouns? [opens my profile, where pronouns (any pronouns) are stated, but does not read deeply enough to look] Pollyx no pronouns, I think she/her but I could be wrong so I will say they/them. They talked about running in a forum post but I don’t know if that’s currently what’s going on.”^ halobear, why did you tell me around a week and a half ago privately that you had no idea I was considering running (when I told you it was rude to take my points from my forum posts outright, knowing I was thinking of running and not even asking me), but when I open your forum post from five days ago, you say out loud you know I’ve considered running and may be running this time? Why would you just lie to me? Lying for no reason is not a great quality for a PB. Also, my bio lists 'no pronouns, genderqueer,' not sure why you couldn't take the time to check that for real? What if my pronouns had turned out to be something else? What's with the hurry when you took so much time to fully read multiple entire posts from me out loud on stream and put points inspired by them in your manifesto?
~10min (forgot timestamp: “This person is known for targeted harassment on the forum and they haven’t been banned in the past because one of our Prime Ximbos LillyAnn attempted to ban this person but they encountered an error and so instead of doing what I would have done as someone with OCD is ask ‘why can’t this person be banned?’ And I would have seen, hmm, they’re a Senator right now, so perhaps they can’t be banned because they’re a Senator, and I would have asked questions like ‘why can’t this person be banned, is it because they are a Senator?’ That’s what I would have done for sure. And then additionally, we found out later on that the reason why they couldn’t be banned, somebody said flippantly, “‘the reason why they can’t be banned is because they’re a Senator. And so that person purchased a Senatorship very quickly after seeing that message and I was aware that person was a citizen up until someone said they couldn’t be banned because they’re a Senator, and Senators can’t be banned, and there it is the secret’s out there. They bought a senatorship just so they couldn’t be banned.”^ you don’t read PH info. it’s interesting all these things are “so obvious” to you. OCD has nothing to do with this. I wish you would stop using your mental health as an excuse for things and a reason for why you know better than others. As a fellow person with OCD, I find this idea a little ridiculous.
~13:50ish “And it’s like if you’re really that threatened about being banned on Ximboland maybe don’t do things that get you banned. Or don’t do things that raise the question of if you should be banned. But that’s just my 2 cents as a person who actually has common sense.”^ wow, your complete lack of engagement in these discussions is staggering if you think that’s how banning always works. Or is it? Because earlier in this same VOD you say you’re afraid of being banned for running for PB, so…? Do you think everyone else is just stupid and lacking in common sense?
~14:30 “KirstyD8 is piecing two things together that don’t even need to be pieced together. We were asking specifically what his job entails, we were asking what is possible, and it was said, we can’t ban this person because of a coding issue.”^”we” is not correct because you did not participate in that conversation. I hope that is a helpful correction. You have not been part of these conversations in any way, on either side. You have not participated. You are taking other people’s points and acting like they are your own when you haven’t done anything in this regard. You want to steal other people's points while also taking no personal risks.
14:50 “I would have to get Lovie in my cabinet because I need somebody who would moderate the forum accordingly, not just put words in people’s mouths or take words out of people’s mouths and also will have proper grammar and punctuation, because you’re Minister of Justice and you’re making like, spelling errors. I’m just pointing it out, that’s all.”^ these actions and statements make you come across as emotionally and verbally dishonest. Why were you privately praising the FP at the time for their moderation ability yet on stream saying these random rude things? I don’t get it. Be consistent, please. Also, can you explain your personal friend’s qualifications for being FP?
30:55 “[to a friend] also I want to talk with you about possibly being in my cabinet if I do win … I don’t know what your job title would be, I think you would probably be like fashion police.”^ ????? what other job title would they have ???? MoJ = FP and the other positions you can assign are FP as well. Indicates a lack of site awareness :(
34:85 “If I’m Prime Bimbo I can not promise some things that he [Chris] can.”^ then why are you promising them? Can you guarantee player houses and pets? How are you so sure? Do you have any idea how that would be done? People may vote for you expecting these things and then be disappointed :(
*****
And a response to a quote of yours (from a reply, not the manifesto):
"Similar to point 3, there was already a previously established system for Fashion Police whereby they were working on a volunteer basis."
That is not how it has always worked. Many previous PBs have paid their FP, I am not sure about Blecky and the current (former) FP. This was discussed among PH and the fact that you are saying this is proof to the fact that you do not know what is going on with the other members of the government you work with. I hope this comes across as respectful and kind, but I'm not comfortable with your manifesto and replies presenting certain points that are factually inaccurate and wanted to share my perspective on this. I don't mean any ill will or bad blood, I just wanted to point things out. Attempts have been made to bridge this gap in private and you refused them. I feel you are being dishonest with your potential voters and the people around you and it's pretty disrespectful to the people who love, populate, and work on this site.
I'm a State Minister and have taken some time to lay out my points, as well as having spent the time to watch your entire most recent VOD (before you made it private) so that I can understand you better and make sure I'm not misunderstanding, so I'm hoping this will help you to be confident I am not a troll.
I’m not going to run for PB this time, for clarity, but I would be posting this regardless of whether or not I was running due to my concerns about your dishonesty (as someone in PH who can verify what you are claiming) and your general ability to come together with the community. My concerns about you claiming you didn't know I was considering running for PB are because you gave me the impression in private that you had nooooo idea I was even thinking about this, which is dishonest when on stream (several days prior to our conversation) you showed that you did.
Much love and take care of yourself! I just have questions and concerns. <3